Jean Gatewood

Funded by Hooters of America, LLC

In an effort to better understand and meet the needs of women in the Hispanic community, Fox Chase Cancer Center is launching an initiative to learn more about their preferences regarding messages that inform and announce the availability of clinical trials for women with breast cancer.

Fox Chase will host a series of focus groups in order to seek guidance from the community on the impact of current announcements, gauge awareness of the availability of clinical trials options and understand how the messaging can be better enhanced in order to make the value of participation in research studies higher-impact.

We will host two focus groups of 10 women each. Focus group 1 will review the existing, Spanish-written brochure and will complete both pre- and post-user testing. Focus group 2 will review the verbal PSA version of the Spanish-written brochure and will also complete pre- and post-user testing. Using the information and feedback gathered from these focus groups, we will tailor our message moving forward to better increase knowledge about the existence, importance and education regarding the availability of clinical trials to minority women in North Philadelphia.

With a better understanding in place, we hope to see an increase in the number of diverse women joining breast cancer clinical research studies to better reflect the racial and ethnic mix of the clinical patient population.

Robert Gatenby, M.D.

The Robert Shields Memorial Grant for Esophageal Cancer was funded by two fundraisers organized by Frank Cannata:  Rolling Thunder’s 2015 “Ride for Freedom,” and The Cannata Report Awards and Charities Dinner

Unlike treatment of other common diseases, cancer therapy is constantly limited by rapid evolution of resistance in the treated (cancer) cells. Unfortunately, the amazing capacity of tumor cells to evolve resistance strategies limits virtually every treatment so that metastatic cancers generally remain fatal.

We propose that, while the ability to evolve confers a great advantage on cancer cells, it also imposes a subtle opportunity for treatment. This is because evolving populations can only adapt to current conditions – they can never anticipate future environments. Importantly we can.  In this project we employ a sequence of treatments. The first therapy both actively kills cancer cells and guides the evolution of cancer cells so that development of resistance, although inevitable, uses a cellular strategy that we can attack with the second line therapy. We term this “double bind” cancer treatment strategy. An excellent illustration of this approach is pest management through “predator facilitation.” For example, in the event of a rodent infestation, a farmer may introduce an owl. However, rodents typically adapt to the owl predation by shifting their activity to the safety of shrubs. While this would seem to be discouraging result (similar to evolution of resistance to therapy in cancer), the “resistance” strategy can, in fact, be exploited by the farmer by introducing snakes. This is a double bind because the owls facilitate the hunting success of snakes and vice-versa. In this project we construct a similar evolutionary dynamics for treating esophageal cancer using a combination of target therapy and immunotherapy.

Luigi Franchi, M.D., Ph.D.

Funded by the Dick Vitale Gala in memory of Chad Carr

Approximatively 10 percent of deadly brain tumors in children are diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG), an aggressive cancer that impacts the body’s most vital functions such as breathing and heart rate. DIPG originates from a genetic mutation and creates an environment that hides cancer cells from the immune system, preventing it from recognizing and fighting the disease. While the prognosis for DIPG has not significantly improved in 25 years, immunotherapy — an approach that encourages the immune system to protect against malignant tumors — has yielded remarkable results in patients with otherwise incurable cancers.
Support from the V-Foundation will help U-M scientists as we seek to identify which genetic mutations in DIPG can be targeted in each patient to restore the immune function, either alone or in combination with other immunotherapeutic methods.

James Ford, M.D.

Funded by the Gastric Cancer Foundation

Dr. James M. Ford, M.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine, Pediatrics and Genetics at Stanford University School of Medicine. He is the Director of the Stanford Cancer Genetics Clinic and the Stanford Clinical Cancer Genomics Program. A recipient of The V Foundation Translational Research grant in 2002, Ford joined the Scientific Advisory Committee in 2003.

Dr. Ford’s research goals are to understand the role of genetic changes in cancer genes in the risk and development of common cancers. He studies the role of the p53 and BRCA1 tumor suppressor genes in DNA repair, and uses techniques for high-throughput genomic analyses of cancer to identify molecular signatures for targeted therapies. Dr. Ford’s clinical interests include the diagnosis and treatment of patients with a hereditary pre-disposition to cancer. He runs the Stanford Cancer Genetics Clinic, that sees patients for genetic counseling and testing of hereditary cancer syndromes, and enters patients on clinical research protocols for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer in high-risk individuals.

Ford graduated Magna Cum Laude with a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1984 and earned his M.D. degree from Yale in 1989. He has been at Stanford ever since, serving as an intern, resident and fellow before earning his postdoc and becoming Assistant Professor in 1998.

Angela Fleischman, M.D., Ph.D.

V Scholar Plus Award- extended funding for exceptional V Scholars

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is a chronic blood cancer without curative treatments. In MPN, blood stem cells obtain mutations that result in excessive numbers of blood cells. Mutations in a gene named calreticulin have been recently found in a large percentage of MPN patients. It is unknown how calreticulin mutations drive MPN. Our goal is to identify how calreticulin mutations cause MPN and to develop drugs targeting calreticulin to treat this disease.

Emily Dykhuizen, Ph.D.

V Scholar Plus Award- extended funding for exceptional V Scholars

Kidney cancer is the 8th most common cancer in the USA. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common and lethal type of kidney cancer. If ccRCC spreads from the kidney, it becomes incredibly deadly. In addition, the drugs that successfully treat other cancers have no effect on the tumors. The most common gene mutation in ccRCC was discovered over 20 years ago. Figuring out the function of this gene led to the first drugs that successfully treat ccRCC. While this has improved the outcome for ccRCC patients, they still only survive an average of 22 months. Additionally, some patients do not respond to these drugs at all. We need to better understand what makes ccRCC different than other cancers. In addition, we need to understand what makes some ccRCC patients different than other ccRCC patients. Our lab studies a protein called Polybromo-1, which is the second most commonly mutated gene in ccRCC. Our goal is to understand how ccRCC patients with mutations in this gene are unique. From this information, we will figure out how to treat this set of patients using new drugs.

John Cole, M.D.

Funded by Hooters of America, LLC

Clinical research is one of the most important ways that we learn what the best treatments are for patients with cancer. Clinical research often tests new types of treatment or new procedures, with the hope that more patients will benefit from the new treatment. Benefits can include improved chances of responding to therapy, fewer side effects and or safer treatments, and most importantly, in some cases, a better chance for cure.

Unfortunately, some groups of patients do not participate in clinical trials. This lack of participation may be due to obstacles or barriers to participation. Barriers can include difficulty in understanding cancer clinical trials or fear of participation in any type of experimental treatment.

The goal of our research project is to develop a better understanding of what barriers may exist in our community (the Greater New Orleans Region) and to develop educational programs to address concerns that some patients may have. We plan to develop a set of educational materials and create opportunities for community education which utilizes both printed materials and live community interactive educational activities.

These actions, if successful, will lead to a greater understanding of cancer clinical trials in cancer and potentially enhance the participation of minority and underrepresented groups in cancer clinical trials.

Jeffrey Clarke, M.D.

Funded in partnership with

the Lung Cancer Initiative of North Carolina

utilizing Stuart Scott Memorial Cancer Fund matching funds

Lung cancer is more common and deadly in African American patients compared to other racial groups. One reason for this difference may depend on the genetics of the tumor and how genes are expressed. We plan to study lung cancer samples to find differences in genes between African American and Caucasian tumors. We will also use a ‘Just Ask’ cultural training program to improve the engagement of African‐American lung cancer patients in research and tissue banking. Our hope is that this work will improve the understanding of reasons for racial differences in lung cancer. We hope that by studying the gene expression of tumors we will find new ways to treat patients with lung cancer in the future.

Terry Badger, Ph.D.

Funded by Hooters of America, LLC

The purpose of our study is to test psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life (QOL) (psychological, physical, social and spiritual well-being) for Latinas with breast cancer and their informal caregivers who are helping them during their cancer journey. Latinas and their caregivers often experience severe psychological distress during cancer treatment and this distress can negatively affect health and well-being. Participants in our study are assigned to either an 8-week supportive health education intervention or an 8-week telephone interpersonal counseling intervention. Both the health education and the counseling are provided over the telephone, and each person is called separately. Our trained health care workers call the women and their caregivers at times that are convenient for them. Sessions are about 30 minutes on the phone each week for 8 weeks. Using the telephone to deliver this service removes many of the access barriers normally associated with counseling or health education. In addition to participating in the 8 education or counseling sessions, we will gather biomarkers using saliva at each measurement period to determine if the intervention was effective at the physiological level. We ask the women and their caregivers to complete some questionnaires 4 times over the next 6 months to determine if the intervention was helpful to them. All study related materials, assessments and sessions are conducted in English or Spanish, depending on the person’s preference. At the end of our study, we also tell them about any other clinical trials that may be of interest.

Michael Armstrong, M.D., Ph.D.

Funded by the Apple Gold Group

Neuroblastoma is the third most common childhood cancer. Unfortunately, despite intensive treatment, two-thirds of children with advanced neuroblastoma succumb to their disease. New treatment options must be developed to improve outcomes in this devastating disease. This requires a better understanding of how neuroblastoma cells survive in the face of these intensive therapies. N-Myc is a member of a family of proto-oncogenes (genes capable of leading to cancer development) implicated as a cause of several cancers. N-Myc plays a central role in the aggressiveness of neuroblastoma tumors. Children whose neuroblastoma tumors have extra copies of the N-Myc gene (N-Myc amplification) fare worse than children whose tumors have the normal number of N-Myc genes. However, it is unknown why extra N-Myc leads to poor outcomes. Mxi1 is a protein related to the Myc family, however, it counteracts the ability of N-Myc to cause cell growth. Mxi0 is a similar protein, but it does not inhibit N-Myc like Mxi1. In this proposal, we will test the hypothesis that the balance of Mxi1 and Mxi0 expression is important for maintaining normal growth, and that N-Myc alters this balance, leading to treatment resistance. To accomplish this, we developed a new kind of mouse which has its Mxi1 or Mxi0 genes removed. In this project, we will examine the impact of decreasing Mxi1 or Mxi0 expression on neuroblastoma tumor formation and response to treatment, with the overall goal of finding a mechanism to bypass the effects of N-Myc and improve the outcomes of children with neuroblastoma.

Mailing List Mailing List
Close Mailing List